[reload all]
[simple read]

Mv IX 23
PTS: Mv IX 7.15 | CS: vin.mv.09.23
Tajjanīyakammavivādakathā
'Line by Line'
The Discussion of Disputes Over a Censure Transaction
by
Ven. Khematto Bhikkhu
Alternate translations/layout: 'read-friendly' layout

256. tajjanīyakammavivādakathā (Mv.IX.7.15)
The Discussion of Disputes Over a Censure Transaction

[218] idha pana bhikkhave bhikkhu bhaṇḍanakārako hoti kalahakārako vivādakārako bhassakārako saṅghe adhikaraṇakārako.

“Monks, there is the case where a monk is a maker of strife, quarrels, disputes, dissension, and issues in the Saṅgha.

tatra ce bhikkhūnaṁ evaṁ hoti ayaṁ kho āvuso bhikkhu bhaṇḍanakārako kalahakārako vivādakārako bhassakārako saṅghe adhikaraṇakārako handassa mayaṁ tajjanīyakammaṁ karomāti.

“Now suppose the thought occurs to the monks, ‘Friends, this monk is a maker of strife, quarrels, disputes, dissension, and issues in the Saṅgha. Let’s impose a censure transaction on him.’

te tassa tajjanīyakammaṁ karonti adhammena vaggā.

“They, a faction, impose a censure transaction on him, not in accordance with the Dhamma.

tatraṭṭho saṅgho vivadati adhammena vaggakammaṁ adhammena samaggakammaṁ dhammapaṭirūpakena vaggakammaṁ dhammapaṭirūpakena samaggakammaṁ akataṁ kammaṁ dukkaṭaṁ kammaṁ puna kātabbaṁ kammanti.

“The Saṅgha there disputes: ‘It’s a factional transaction, not in accordance with the Dhamma; a united transaction, not in accordance with the Dhamma; a semblance-of-Dhamma factional transaction; a semblance-of-Dhamma united transaction; it’s an undone transaction, a poorly done transaction; the transaction should be done again.’

tatra bhikkhave ye te bhikkhū evamāhaṁsu adhammena vaggakammanti ye ca te bhikkhū evamāhaṁsu akataṁ kammaṁ dukkaṭaṁ kammaṁ puna kātabbaṁ kammanti. ime tattha bhikkhū dhammavādino.

“The monks there who say, ‘It’s a factional transaction, not in accordance with the Dhamma,’ and those who say, ‘It’s an undone transaction, a poorly done transaction; the transaction should be done again,’ — in this case, these monks are speakers of Dhamma.

(Mv.IX.7.16) [219] idha pana bhikkhave bhikkhu bhaṇḍanakārako hoti kalahakārako vivādakārako bhassakārako saṅghe adhikaraṇakārako.

“Monks, there is the case where a monk is a maker of strife, quarrels, disputes, dissension, and issues in the Saṅgha.

tatra ce bhikkhūnaṁ evaṁ hoti ayaṁ kho āvuso bhikkhu bhaṇḍanakārako kalahakārako vivādakārako bhassakārako saṅghe adhikaraṇakārako handassa mayaṁ tajjanīyakammaṁ karomāti.

“Now suppose the thought occurs to the monks, ‘Friends, this monk is a maker of strife, quarrels, disputes, dissension, and issues in the Saṅgha. Let’s impose a censure transaction on him.’

te tassa tajjanīyakammaṁ karonti adhammena samaggā.

“They, united, impose a censure transaction on him, not in accordance with the Dhamma.

tatraṭṭho saṅgho vivadati adhammena vaggakammaṁ adhammena samaggakammaṁ dhammena vaggakammaṁ dhammapaṭirūpakena vaggakammaṁ dhammapaṭirūpakena samaggakammaṁ akataṁ kammaṁ dukkaṭaṁ kammaṁ puna kātabbaṁ kammanti.

“The Saṅgha there disputes: ‘It’s a factional transaction, not in accordance with the Dhamma; a united transaction, not in accordance with the Dhamma; a semblance-of-Dhamma factional transaction; a semblance-of-Dhamma united transaction; it’s an undone transaction, a poorly done transaction; the transaction should be done again.’

tatra bhikkhave ye te bhikkhū evamāhaṁsu adhammena samaggakammanti ye ca te bhikkhū evamāhaṁsu akataṁ kammaṁ dukkaṭaṁ kammaṁ puna kātabbaṁ kammanti. ime tattha bhikkhū dhammavādino.

“The monks there who say, ‘It’s a united transaction, not in accordance with the Dhamma,’ and those who say, ‘It’s an undone transaction, a poorly done transaction; the transaction should be done again,’ — in this case, these monks are speakers of Dhamma.

[220] idha pana bhikkhave bhikkhu bhaṇḍanakārako hoti kalahakārako vivādakārako bhassakārako saṅghe adhikaraṇakārako.

“Monks, there is the case where a monk is a maker of strife, quarrels, disputes, dissension, and issues in the Saṅgha.

tatra ce bhikkhūnaṁ evaṁ hoti ayaṁ kho āvuso bhikkhu bhaṇḍanakārako kalahakārako vivādakārako bhassakārako saṅghe adhikaraṇakārako handassa mayaṁ tajjanīyakammaṁ karomāti.

“Now suppose the thought occurs to the monks, ‘Friends, this monk is a maker of strife, quarrels, disputes, dissension, and issues in the Saṅgha. Let’s impose a censure transaction on him.’

te tassa tajjanīyakammaṁ karonti dhammena vaggā.

“They, a faction, impose a censure transaction on him, in accordance with the Dhamma.

tatraṭṭho saṅgho vivadati adhammena vaggakammaṁ dhammena samaggakammaṁ dhammena vaggakammaṁ dhammapaṭirūpakena vaggakammaṁ dhammapaṭirūpakena samaggakammaṁ akataṁ kammaṁ dukkaṭaṁ kammaṁ puna kātabbaṁ kammanti.

“The Saṅgha there disputes: ‘It’s a factional transaction, not in accordance with the Dhamma; a united transaction, not in accordance with the Dhamma; a semblance-of-Dhamma factional transaction; a semblance-of-Dhamma united transaction; it’s an undone transaction, a poorly done transaction; the transaction should be done again.’

tatra bhikkhave ye te bhikkhū evamāhaṁsu dhammena vaggakammanti ye ca te bhikkhū evamāhaṁsu akataṁ kammaṁ dukkaṭaṁ kammaṁ puna kātabbaṁ kammanti. ime tattha bhikkhū dhammavādino.

“The monks there who say, ‘It’s a factional transaction, in accordance with the Dhamma,’ and those who say, ‘It’s an undone transaction, a poorly done transaction; the transaction should be done again,’ — in this case, these monks are speakers of Dhamma.

[221] idha pana bhikkhave bhikkhu bhaṇḍanakārako hoti kalahakārako vivādakārako bhassakārako saṅghe adhikaraṇakārako.

“Monks, there is the case where a monk is a maker of strife, quarrels, disputes, dissension, and issues in the Saṅgha.

tatra ce bhikkhūnaṁ evaṁ hoti ayaṁ kho āvuso bhikkhu bhaṇḍanakārako kalahakārako vivādakārako bhassakārako saṅghe adhikaraṇakārako handassa mayaṁ tajjanīyakammaṁ karomāti.

“Now suppose the thought occurs to the monks, ‘Friends, this monk is a maker of strife, quarrels, disputes, dissension, and issues in the Saṅgha. Let’s impose a censure transaction on him.’

te tassa tajjanīyakammaṁ karonti dhammapaṭirūpakena vaggā.

“They, a faction, impose a censure transaction on him that is a semblance of the Dhamma.

tatraṭṭho saṅgho vivadati adhammena vaggakammaṁ adhammena samaggakammaṁ dhammena vaggakammaṁ dhammapaṭirūpakena vaggakammaṁ dhammapaṭirūpakena samaggakammaṁ akataṁ kammaṁ dukkaṭaṁ kammaṁ puna kātabbaṁ kammanti.

“The Saṅgha there disputes: ‘It’s a factional transaction, not in accordance with the Dhamma; a united transaction, not in accordance with the Dhamma; a semblance-of-Dhamma factional transaction; a semblance-of-Dhamma united transaction; it’s an undone transaction, a poorly done transaction; the transaction should be done again.’

tatra bhikkhave ye te bhikkhū evamāhaṁsu dhammapaṭirūpakena vaggakammanti ye ca te bhikkhū evamāhaṁsu akataṁ kammaṁ dukkaṭaṁ kammaṁ puna kātabbaṁ kammanti. ime tattha bhikkhū dhammavādino.

“The monks there who say, ‘It’s a semblance-of-Dhamma, factional transaction,’ and those who say, ‘It’s an undone transaction, a poorly done transaction; the transaction should be done again,’ — in this case, these monks are speakers of Dhamma.

[222] idha pana bhikkhave bhikkhu bhaṇḍanakārako hoti kalahakārako vivādakārako bhassakārako saṅghe adhikaraṇakārako.

“Monks, there is the case where a monk is a maker of strife, quarrels, disputes, dissension, and issues in the Saṅgha.

tatra ce bhikkhūnaṁ evaṁ hoti ayaṁ kho āvuso bhikkhu bhaṇḍanakārako kalahakārako vivādakārako bhassakārako saṅghe adhikaraṇakārako handassa mayaṁ tajjanīyakammaṁ karomāti.

“Now suppose the thought occurs to the monks, ‘Friends, this monk is a maker of strife, quarrels, disputes, dissension, and issues in the Saṅgha. Let’s impose a censure transaction on him.’

te tassa tajjanīyakammaṁ karonti dhammapaṭirūpakena samaggā.

They, united, impose a censure transaction on him that is a semblance of the Dhamma.

tatraṭṭho saṅgho vivadati adhammena vaggakammaṁ adhammena samaggakammaṁ dhammena vaggakammaṁ dhammapaṭirūpakena vaggakammaṁ dhammapaṭirūpakena samaggakammaṁ akataṁ kammaṁ dukkaṭaṁ kammaṁ puna kātabbaṁ kammanti.

“The Saṅgha there disputes: ‘It’s a factional transaction, not in accordance with the Dhamma; a united transaction, not in accordance with the Dhamma; a semblance-of-Dhamma factional transaction; a semblance-of-Dhamma united transaction; it’s an undone transaction, a poorly done transaction; the transaction should be done again.’

tatra bhikkhave ye te bhikkhū evamāhaṁsu dhammapaṭirūpakena samaggakammanti ye ca te bhikkhū evamāhaṁsu akataṁ kammaṁ dukkaṭaṁ kammaṁ puna kātabbaṁ kammanti. ime tattha bhikkhū dhammavādino.

“The monks there who say, ‘It’s a semblance-of-Dhamma, united transaction,’ and those who say, ‘It’s an undone transaction, a poorly done transaction; the transaction should be done again,’ — in this case, these monks are speakers of Dhamma.

[previous page][next page]